双方重点转变,中非交往进入新阶段

Listen to this article

As Priorities Change for Both Sides, China’s Engagement with Africa Enters a New Phase

By Joseph Moss, International Banker

 

China’s economic engagement with Africa is entering a new phase. The scale of activity is not returning to the headline-grabbing peaks of the mid-2010s, when large state-backed infrastructure loans dominated the relationship. Instead, it has shifted towards more selective, commercially structured investments that are often tied to industrial capacity, resource security and supply-chain positioning. As such, China’s engagement with the African continent appears to reflect both the constraints within China’s domestic economy and the shifting priorities across African states.

Recent years have seen the China-Africa partnership flourish through a combination of infrastructure agreements, industrial investments and raw-material and energy projects. The global transition toward electric vehicles and renewable energies has also increased demand for critical minerals, such as cobalt, lithium and copper.

Africa holds a substantial share of these resources, particularly in countries such as the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DR Congo) and Zambia. “Experience in Africa shows that China is not afraid of political or economic instability,” Jimmy Munguriek, a lawyer and country director of the non-governmental organisation (NGO) Resource Matters in the DR Congo, told German state media outlet Deutsche Welle (DW) in December. “China is investing, and that is why many mining sectors in Africa, especially in the Democratic Republic of Congo, are now largely controlled by Chinese companies.”

Alongside mining investments, the construction of processing facilities for raw materials and the development of key infrastructure projects have enabled Chinese firms to secure access to essential inputs for China’s industrial strategy and achieve greater control over supply chains. In turn, this is crucially providing the country with economic and geopolitical leverage in a continent that is fast becoming a strategic arena for big-power competition for influence, market access and resource security.

Acknowledging this new reality, African governments are increasingly seeking to diversify their partnerships and reduce their dependence on any single external actor. This is creating a more contested environment in which projects are evaluated not only on raw financing terms, but also on a variety of benefits the continent can realise, including technology transfer, local employment and long-term economic impact.

The United States has stepped up its own engagement through initiatives such as the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII), which aims to mobilise private capital for infrastructure projects in low- and middle-income countries. US development finance institutions (DFIs), including the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC), have also expanded their presence, primarily by partnering with the private sector to finance projects in energy, infrastructure, agriculture and healthcare.

According to the DFC’s chief executive officer, Ben Black, Africa is a critical market for the future and a vital partner. “We want to structure investments that can transform and improve economic trajectories for entire regions while advancing the US’ strategic interests abroad,” Black said recently at the Atlantic Council’s Investing in Africa Forum on the margins of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank Group’s 2026 Spring Meetings. “It’s time to stop talking about Africa’s potential and time to start delivering on its promise. By investing in infrastructure, fostering private sector-led growth, and advancing regional stability, we can build a future of shared prosperity for Africa’s continued growth and success.”

Western engagement with Africa tends to rely heavily on private-capital mobilisation, which can considerably slow deployment and cause fluctuating, almost spasmodic, changes in investment levels from year-to-year. “America shoots up and then disappears, shoots up and disappears. That is purely because it’s a private, profit-minded approach. These are private companies, and they’re not giving money just for charity,” James Shikwati, founder and director of the Inter Region Economic Network (IREN) in Kenya’s capital, Nairobi, explained to DW in December.

A leaked email sent to staff in the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of African Affairs (AF) from its leading official, Nick Checker, raises further questions over the true strength of American commitment to the continent. According to the email, which was seen and published by The Guardian on January 20, “Africa is a peripheral—rather than a core—theater for US interests that demands strategic economy” and that framing Africa as strategic “has often historically served bureaucratic and moral imperatives, not hard interests”.

In contrast, China continues to retain several advantages. For one, it offers integrated financing and construction capabilities, often through state-backed enterprises.

In contrast, China continues to retain several advantages. For one, it offers integrated financing and construction capabilities, often through state-backed enterprises. Projects can thus move quickly from agreement to execution.

“The developmental goals, investments, trade opportunities, and the quest for soft power that underlie China’s engagement with Africa are not short-term pursuits. They are sustained by consistent, long-term engagement rather than episodic, volatile initiatives,” Philip Akrofi Atitianti, a senior research fellow at the Africa-China Centre for Policy and Advisory (ACCPA), Ghana, wrote in a blog post for the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) on March 19. “China’s political structure is better equipped to operate on that timeline. Beijing is not subject to democratic electoral turnover and is therefore less prone to routinely reinventing its foreign policy priorities. China’s current political system allows it to easily align ministries, policy banks, and state-owned enterprises with its foreign policy objectives.”

The triennial Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC), last held in September 2024 and governed by the Beijing Action Plan (2025-2027), unveiled 10 partnership initiatives to strengthen China-Africa ties, including industrial-chain cooperation, green development and security. Key goals include RMB 360 billion in financial support, training for African professionals and 100-percent tariff-free access for least developed countries (LDCs). China will also provide RMB 360 billion in financial support over three years, including RMB 210 billion in credit lines, RMB 80 billion in assistance and at least RMB 70 billion in investment.

On November 22, moreover, China and South Africa jointly launched their new Initiative on Cooperation Supporting Modernization in Africa, with China represented by the premier of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China, Li Qiang. The initiative reflects a shift in emphasis from traditional infrastructure toward broader economic transformation, including industrialisation, digital development, skills transfer and green energy.

Rather than positioning investment solely as a means of building physical assets, the initiative emphasises integration into global value chains and the development of domestic industrial capacity. This aligns with the priorities of several African governments, which are seeking to move beyond commodity exports toward more diversified economies.

As domestic growth moderates on China’s side, companies are increasingly seeking external markets for expansion, particularly in sectors in which they hold cost or scale advantages. Africa, with its growing urban population and expanding consumer base, provides a natural destination for that outward push.

Indeed, a broader sectoral spread across mining, consumer goods and light manufacturing reflects both changing economic priorities within China and evolving demand within African markets. “In the early days, Chinese companies that went over were doing a lot more infrastructure, and they were also doing a lot of the natural minerals mining,” Joe Ngai, chairman of McKinsey Greater China, recently observed. “In the last few years, I think people are trying to think of the African consumer market.”

Digital infrastructure represents another area of increasing importance that requires substantial investments across much of Africa. Chinese technology companies have been active in building telecommunications networks, data centres and digital payment systems. Indeed, as the Pan-African business-media platform WeeTracker noted in October, Chinese technology firms, including Huawei and ZTE, are among the major players quietly helping to build out the continent’s digital backbone.

“Chinese companies have increasingly become architects, engineers, and builders of connectivity, laying cables, erecting towers, powering base stations, and providing the devices and systems that make the network usable,” according to WeeTracker investment analyst Oyedeji Emmanuel. “From core network infrastructure and cloud computing to smartphones and e-commerce, Chinese companies are helping to shape how Africans connect, pay, learn, and work.”

Wang Ligui, counsellor of the Chinese Mission to the African Union (AU), recently called for stronger strategic alignment between the AU-led Programme for Infrastructure Development in Africa (PIDA) and China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) to accelerate infrastructure development across the continent. “China and Africa need to make use of all cooperation platforms, such as the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC), to support infrastructure development in Africa,” he said, as quoted by the Chinese news agency Xinhua. “African countries need to improve the business environment, offer preferential policies and increase investment protection, so as to retain Chinese enterprises that are already doing business on the continent, and attract more.”